Needling China before Next
Year's Olympics
By B. Raman
Are the US and the European Union (EU) planning to dangle
over the head of China the Damocles Sword of a possible
boycott of next year's Beijing Olympics in order to make
China to be more amenable to Western pressure on issues such
as greater democracy and respect for human rights in China,
genuine religious freedom, greater co-operation with the
international community in exercising pressure on the
unpopular military junta in Myanmar to give up its policy of
repression and greater respect for the human rights of the
Tibetans and talks with the Dalai Lama on the future of
Tibet?
2. This question has been worrying the Chinese ever
since some human rights activists in the US and West Europe
started calling for a boycott of the Beijing Olympics in
protest against the Chinese policy on Darfur, thereby making
Beijing take some corrective measures in its policy towards
Sudan. The Chinese eagerness to make a success of the
Olympics and to project a positive image of itself in the
months before the Olympics is viewed by Western human rights
and pro-democracy activists as providing an opportunity to
Western Governments to exercise pressure on China on other
issues too.
3. The contradictory statements made by President George
Bush on this issue during the Asia-Pacific Economic
Co-operation (APEC) summit at Sydney in the first week of
September, 2007, must have added to the Chinese concerns.
The initial remarks of Mr. Bush and his spokesmen were
reassuring to the Chinese. After a bilateral meeting with
President Hu Jintao on September 6, 2007, Mr. Bush said:
"He extended an invitation to me and Laura and our family to
come to the Olympics. And of course, I was anxious to
accept." One of his spokesmen subsequently said: "The
President had stressed to Hu that for him, he was going to
the Olympics for the sports and not for any political
statements."
4. However, the American language changed the next day.
Mr. Bush said: "We will encourage China to open up its
political system and give greater voice to its people. Next
year, China will host the Olympic Games, and it will be a
moment of pride for the Chinese people. It will also be a
moment when the eyes of the entire world will fall on
Beijing. We urge China's leaders to use this moment to show
confidence by demonstrating a commitment to greater openness
and tolerance."
5. Mr. Bush urged the creation of an "Asia Pacific
Democracy Partnership" to help "forces of moderation" in the
region and added: "We must work for the day when the people
of North Korea enjoy the same freedoms as the citizens of
their democratic neighbours. We must press the regime in
Burma to stop arresting, harassing, and assaulting
pro-democracy activists for organizing or participating in
peaceful demonstrations. The Burmese regime must release
these activists immediately, stop its intimidation of those
Burmese citizens who are promoting democracy and human
rights, and release all political prisoners, including Aung
San Suu Kyi."
6. The reversal of the more moderate position of Mr. Bush
came at a time when reports had started flowing in from
Myanmar about the brutal suppression of the non-violent
agitation of the pro-democracy activists by the military
regime. Myanmar and Tibetan political exiles abroad started
pointing out the inappropriateness of holding the Olympics
in China at a time when China allegedly continued to support
the brutal regime in Myanmar and to deny basic human rights
to the Tibetans. Reports also started coming in during this
period of Chinese allegedly harassing or even arresting
people in Sichuan and Tibet, who talked of the Buddhist
belief in reincarnation. The Chinese are determined that
just as they did in the case of the Panchen Lama, the
Communist Party would also choose the successor of the
present Dalai Lama after his death. There were also reports
of some Indian traders from Sikkim going across to Tibet for
trading purposes being harassed because they had a
photograph of the Dalai Lama.
7. As the full scale of the repression in Myanmar by the
Junta came to be known to the outside world, demands were
voiced by Western human rights activists and pro-democracy
organisations for a boycott of the Beijing Olympics in
protest over China's continued support to the Junta. Even
some Western political leaders joined in this call for
boycott. On September 27, 2007, the Vice-President of the
European Parliament, Mr. Edward McMillan-Scott, said that he
would write to the British Prime Minister, Mr. Gordon Brown,
and other EU leaders to discuss whether Western athletes
should oppose the Beijing games. He told the Reuters news
agency: "The consensus around the European Parliament is
that China is the key. China is the puppet master of Burma.
The Olympics is the only real lever we have to make China
act. The civilized world must seriously consider shunning
China by using the Beijing Olympics to send the clear
message that such abuses of human rights are not
acceptable." Simultaneously, Mr. Justin Kilcullen, Director
of Trocaire, an Irish charity organisation, said in a
statement: 'China is the only country that can bring the
oppressive regime in Burma to heel. One thing they are very
sensitive about is their Olympic games. I believe it's time
now to say unless they can live up to the responsibilities
of that role and bring their client state of Burma to heel,
we should boycott those Olympics"
8. In this context, China has reasons to be worried by
the very high-profile welcome being accorded to the Dalai
Lama, who is presently on a visit to the US. His supporters
in the US have been taking advantage of his visit to remind
the American people of the alleged Chinese denial of human
rights to the Tibetans. Without openly linking the issue to
next year's Olympics, the Bush Administration and the
Congress have also been co-operating with the supporters of
the Dalai Lama by giving him an official welcome the like of
which he had not received during his previous visits to the
US.
9. He was bestowed with the Congressional gold medal,
United States' highest civilian honour, at a ceremony on
October 17, 2007, in recognition of his role as 'one of the
world's foremost moral and religious figures, who is using
his leadership role to advocate peacefully for the cultural
autonomy of the Tibetan people within China.' Mr. Bush
became the first sitting US President to meet the Dalai Lama
in public. After formally receiving the Dalai Lama in the
White House, Mr. Bush said: "I have consistently told the
Chinese that religious freedom is in their nation's
interest. I have also told them that I think it is in their
interest to meet with the Dalai Lama. "After the
Congressional function, which Mr. Bush attended in an
extraordinary gesture to the Dalai Lama, he said: "It
(Congress) has conferred this honour on a figure whose work
continues, and whose outcome remains uncertain. In doing so,
America raises its voice in the call for religious liberty
and basic human rights. "Democratic Speaker of the House,
Ms. Nancy Pelosi, said, "With this gold medal, we affirm the
special relationship between His Holiness the Dalai Lama and
the United States." The Bush Administration and the Congress
went ahead with their programme despite strong Chinese
protests over it.
10. The US honour to the Dalai Lama coincided with the
17th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party currently being
held in Beijing, which is expected, inter alia, to review
the arrangements for next year's Olympics. As of now, there
appears to be little likelihood of a boycott of the Olympics
by the participating countries despite the pro-boycott
rhetoric emanating from some sections of the civil society
and the political class in the US and the EU countries. They
are using the talk of a possible boycott more to scare the
Chinese into responding more positively on issues such as
democracy and human rights---particularly in Myanmar and
Tibet. What the Chinese should be worried about is that if
this rhetoric continues unabated, it could have a negative
impact on the flow of visitors to China to watch the
Olympics.
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and,
presently, Director, Institute for Topical Studies, Chennai.
He is also associated with the Chennai Centre For China
Studies. E-mail:
seventyone2@gmail.com)